I often talk about the difference between self employment and being in business. They are often incorrectly perceived as being the same thing. My blog thoughts are focused on personal service businesses.
So what is the difference? Well the clue lies in the risk and reward attached to each. If you are self-employed there is a significant risk that you will not realise your true earning potential. Why? because your reward will be limited by the amount of work you can produce. A true business should have more more than fee earner and a portfolio of services and the main risk is failure. The reward is correspondingly unlimited.
If you feel trapped in a self-employment you can take solace in the fact that you are not alone. A self employment can become a job you can’t escape from without a proper growth strategy. A simple model I use to illustrate the path from self-employment to running a business is “STEP”.
S = strategise
So how to you transform your self-employment into a business?: Well think about how to STRATEGISE, and determine the direction you want your business to take. If you don’t have a strategy then the danger is that you haven’t properly considered your customer needs. Look at the profile of your services…are they value based or commodity based?
There is a place for commodity services but they are likely to be marketed through a fixed price model and by larger organisations who can benefit from economies of scale. This will require input from staff rather than fee earners, whereas value based services will capitalise on the skills of fee earners.
Commodity based services should be delivered using a separate business model to ensure that they are not subsidised by value added services. Caution is required as the market value of commodity services will inevitably be driven down towards their cost. High street law firms are facing a big challenge as they prepare to streamline their offerings to compete with the likes of Co-op Legal Services, as the true impact of the Legal Services Act and Alternative Business Structures is felt.
T = test
Strategy is theory and financial performance is reality so what is the connection between the two: Answer = your Business Plan. The business plan is your route map, once you have determined your strategy and decided on your courses of action. The important attribute of a business plan is that it lets you TEST your financial performance against your strategy as long as your financial forecasts fairly represent your strategy.
If you are consistently not hitting your sales targets then you need to be honest with yourself about the causes. It is easy to blame market conditions but often it represents a misunderstanding of customer needs and perceptions. Financial advisers have a tough task in remodelling their businesses around fixed fees when the Retail Distribution Regulations come into force, if they have not profiled their practices around value added services. The market value of their traditional commodity services such as the sale of pension and protection policies has been disguised by traditional commission based sales models. Clients have often been oblivious to the charges being taken from their policies as commission despite their right to enquire about them. Paradoxically they are likely to object about equivalent charges presented to them as a fixed fee. Clients perceptions need to be managed as well as their needs.
E = evaluate
The process of rationalising your service offerings is a call to EVALUATE what you do. Commodity services have their place but Value Added Services are the holy grail of personal service businesses.
Why? because the value of them is something you can influence. An accountant who promotes a tax structure scheme can charge a contingency fee. A stamp duty scheme could save £50,000 and a fee of £25,ooo may not seem out of place in this context. This fee is determined not by time spent the seniority of the fee earner completing the work or the market conditions – it is determined by value. Look at what you do and think about how you could develop services which could generate contingency fees. And whenever possible develop recurring income as well, particularly those that have a value added content such as support contracts offering clients peace of mind for an appropriate cost.
P = productise
Professionals can no longer price their commodity services based solely on hourly rates. The price they can charge is increasingly determined by the amounts charged by their competitors and the need to offer certainty. They are effectively being forced to PRODUCTISE their offering where they are compliance based services such as small business accounts and tax returns. In the case of accountants, for example, the market value of specialised services such as auditing is easier to maintain than other compliance services as increasingly rigorous standards are imposed to protect consumers and smaller firms leave the market.
Specialisation can be a good way of enabling you to productise what you do. This may take the form of a cloud based service which replicates or supplements your service offering and going forward customers will be looking for more services to be available in the cloud. Alternatively it may simply be an increased awareness of differentiating what you do from your competitors through fixed pricing or personal branding. You should not be frightened of specialising in terms of the services you provide on the basis that you may limit your potential customer base… rather you should welcome it as a way of protecting your future income streams.
A final thought..
You will note that I have referred to “clients” not “customers” in this blog. Is this a mistake? well it could be. It has been suggested to me that professionals perceive clients as an ongoing source of income and should instead think of them as customers who require a constant review of needs and requirements. All I can say to this is ..fair point, I agree. Have you got clients or customers?